<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Identity Protection on krisby.dev</title>
    <link>https://krisby.dev/en/tags/identity-protection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Identity Protection on krisby.dev</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://krisby.dev/en/tags/identity-protection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Conditional Access &amp; Identity Protection</title>
      <link>https://krisby.dev/en/writeups/conditional-access-identity-protection/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://krisby.dev/en/writeups/conditional-access-identity-protection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;background&#34;&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I wanted to better understand how Microsoft Entra Identity Protection works in practice and how risk-based Conditional Access can be used to protect user accounts.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Instead of requiring MFA for every sign-in, I wanted to see how Entra reacts when a user or a sign-in is considered risky.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-i-built&#34;&gt;What I Built&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In this lab, I configured:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Microsoft Entra Identity Protection&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Risk-based Conditional Access policies&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;MFA using Microsoft Authenticator&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;A dedicated test account for simulating different sign-in scenarios&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-i-tested&#34;&gt;What I Tested&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I tested several scenarios, including:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
